• City Secretary Position Profile

    Dear Community,

    The City of Alpine is now accepting cover letters and resumes for the position of City Secretary.

    We encourage all qualified and interested applicants to apply.  Please click here for a more in depth view of the position and the process to show interest.

    Have a great day,

    Erik Zimmer, City Manager

  • Texas Highway Magazine – Saddle Club Article

    Dear Citizens,

    If you have not had a chance to pick up the latest edition of Texas Highway’s Travel Magazine, here’s a link to a great article this month.

    Stephen Wood is a consummate professional and a friend to all in the community.

    Enjoy the read and have a great day in Alpine.

    Erik Zimmer, City Manager

  • Press Release – 7-14-17

    Dear Citizens and Media,

    The City of Alpine has has historically participated in the collection and distribution of the Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) funds. Hoteliers collect the funds when people stay in their establishments and then pay into the City HOT Fund either monthly or quarterly (depending on their size). The State of Texas has certain guidelines on how communities can distribute these funds.
    The City is allowed to delegate the expenditure of these hotel taxes to another entity (for example, a Chamber to run a Visitor Center) as long as they follow the guidelines of the usage law and keep the hotel tax funds in a separate account. Tax code 351.101 does a nice job giving further explanation.
    In 2015, the City Manager requested the Chamber to demonstrate to the City that these guidelines were being met and to submit regular sets of financial documents back to the City. In early 2016, the City Manager followed this request up in writing.  After repeated delays from the Chamber, the documents were finally submitted in February 2017. Through an initial review of these documents, the City Manager deemed it necessary for the City to take back over running of the Visitor Center. At the March 21, 2017 City Council meeting, the City Council took action and authorized the City Manager to move forward with the City taking over management of the Visitor Center.
    As part of the Cities financial process, we deemed it necessary to perform an audit of expenditures from the Visitor Center account back to January 2016. Through that audit, we found further peculiarities that caused the City to initiate a letter to the Chamber asking for further explanation from the fund. If the expenditures do not meet State requirements, the City will be asking for a refund of those questionable expenses.
    The City is aware that the Chamber has gathered legal counsel and is working back with the Texas Ranger and law enforcement in general. We continue to keep apprised and ready for the Chamber’s feedback and are cooperating with law enforcement.
    There is no wrong-doing on the City of Alpines part. We are simply working to uphold the law and ensure supporting entities do the same.
    Please address any inquiries to our City Manager, Erik Zimmer.
    432-837-3301 or erik.zimmer@ci.alpine.tx.us

  • Vision Plan Readout

    Dear Citizens,

    Councilor Rick Stephens and I have finally been able to establish a date for the community readout relative to the Vision Plan that the City worked with UTSA on during 2016.

    A copy of the flyover and vision plan itself are available on our City website.

    The readout will start at 5:30pm next Wednesday June 21, 2017 and will occur at our Civic Center.  We encourage all citizens to come out and participate.

    We did clear with the School Board to ensure this date does not conflict with their school board meeting.  Their meeting is scheduled for the following week.

    This comprehensive Vision Plan has many great elements and opportunities for the City to consider. Please feel free to reach out to me in the interim with any questions.

    Kindest regards, 

    Erik Zimmer, City Manager

  • Gift to the City from TPP, LLC

    City of Alpine Receives $400,000 Gift from Trans-Pecos Pipeline, LLC to Support City of Alpine’s Vision Plan and Alpine Volunteer Fire Department

    ALPINE, Texas, June 12, 2017 – The City of Alpine today announced it has received a $400,000 gift from Trans-Pecos Pipeline, LLC that will be used to construct a scenic walking path as identified in the City’s Vision Plan, and to offset costs for new equipment and other needs of the City of Alpine Volunteer Fire Department.

    “The construction of a scenic walking path along Alpine Creek has long been a part of our City Vision Plan to make use of this great linear space that runs right through the center of our city,” said Erik Zimmer, Alpine City Manager. “The 1.5 mile path will connect northern, central, and southern parts of Alpine, creating a unified pedestrian passageway that will be a beautiful, natural open space for our citizens and visitors to enjoy.”

    The scenic walking path will cost approximately $215,000 to construct and will accommodate multiple types of recreational activity including jogging, walking, inline skating, and bicycling. Construction is anticipated to start by mid-August and be completed before the end of 2017.

    The remaining amount of the gift, approximately $185,000 will go toward the City of Alpine Volunteer Fire Department for new equipment and vehicle upgrades.  New equipment will include new safety gear, radios, and hose replacements.

    “There is no doubt that many Alpine residents have expressed concerns about pipeline safety and the environment,” said Rick Stephens, City of Alpine Council Member. “This significant gift from Trans-Pecos Pipeline, LLC clearly demonstrates their commitment to safety and to the quality of life in the communities they construct and operate.

    “The City appreciates the financial commitment from Energy Transfer Partners to help facilitate increased readiness of our local fire department and enhanced recreational opportunities for our residents and visitors.”

    The Trans-Pecos Pipeline traverses 33 miles through Brewster County, Texas, and crosses just outside of Alpine city limits where additional safety measures were added to the pipeline. Trans-Pecos Pipeline, LLC and their primary vendor, Pumpco, have been operating in and around the City of Alpine since 2015, which has contributed to increased sales for many local businesses. Some of the employees’ families have been students and participants in Alpine schools and volunteer organizations. 

    Trans-Pecos Pipeline, LLC is a joint venture owned in part by an affiliate of Energy Transfer Partners (ETP), L.P.

  • City Manager Transition

    Dear Citizens,

    First and foremost, I want to communicate it has been a great pleasure serving as the City Manager for Alpine, TX.  
    When we started down this path in late 2013, the City was challenged with investigations and financial troubles.  Over the last four years we have been able to navigate to a better place with a keen focus on financial health and restoration of City owned assets.  We’ve encountered several bumps and challenges along the way, but successfully stayed the course and find ourselves in a much better position today.
    My family and I have come to a time in life where we are ready to start a new chapter.  Decisions are never easy, and there are always many factors to consider.  At this juncture, we’ve determined that Albuquerque, NM is the right place for us to go.  As many of you are aware, Dee Dee’s family roots are in NM and we have an abundance of family throughout that area.
    The most important item that will queue up for the City relative to this transition centers around the recruitment and timing of a new City Manager.  My commitment to our community is that I will work with the City on a robust transition plan that promotes continuity in the position and does not leave staff or the City in a precarious position.  The new business I will be forming gives me the opportunity to progress in this manner.  Simply stated, we’ve worked too hard to have a gap in leadership.
    As always, my door is open and I enjoy questions and dialogue.  Please feel free to ask questions directly to me.
    Thank you,
    Erik Zimmer, City Manager
  • 10 Most Beautiful Cities in Texas

    Good Morning Alpine,

    Here’s a link to a great article depicting the majestic appeal of our community.


    Erik Zimmer, City Manager

    10 of the Most Beautiful Cities in Texas

  • 2017 City Pool Hours and Rates

    OPENS – Saturday, June 3, 2017
    Hours – 12:00 PM to 5:00 PM 
    Admission Per Day: Children – $2.00
    Adults – $ 3.00
    Non-swimming adult – no charge
    Yearly Pass – Family (up to 6 members) $55 – all family members must reside together
    Individual – $35.00
    Pool Party – Thursday, Friday, or Saturday 6pm – 8pm
    $25.00 deposit
    $40.00 an hour
  • Texas Tort Claims Act

    Dear Citizens,

    From time to time, my office receives request for consideration related to damages to personal property of citizens in the community.  The City of Alpine utilizes the Texas Municipal League’s Insurance Risk Pool (TMLIRP) to handle these types of requests.  

    Many times a citizen may also be referred back to the Texas Tort Claims Act as part of handling the request.  The Texas Legislature came out with the act in 1969 that waived some of what used to be ‘entire sovereign immunity’ for local governments.

    Texas Municipal League also put out this article in February 2005 to help identify key pieces of the legislation.  I’ve copied the article in it’s entirety for your reading pleasure:

    What is the Texas Tort Claims Act?
    The Texas Tort Claims Act (“The Act”) is a set of statutes that determine when a
    governmental entity may be liable for tortious conduct under state law. Prior to the
    adoption of the Act, individuals could not recover damages from state or local
    governmental units for injuries resulting from the actions of a government employee or
    officer in the performance of a governmental function.
    Granting governmental units sovereign immunity serves several purposes. It protects
    governmental time and resources from diminishment from private litigation and
    encourages forthright action by public officials. It also protects the government from
    fraudulent or frivolous suits that otherwise may arise because of the perceived “deep
    pockets” of government entities.
    In 1969, the Texas Legislature enacted the Texas Tort Claims Act. The Act waived
    sovereign immunity for a governmental entity that was engaged in a governmental
    A governmental unit in the state is liable for:
    (1) property damage, personal injury, and death proximately
    caused by the wrongful act or omission or the negligence of
    an employee acting within his scope of employment if:
    (A) the property damage, personal injury, or death arises
    from the operation or use of a motor-driven vehicle or
    motor-driven equipment; and
    (B) the employee would be personally liable to the
    claimant according to Texas law; and
    (2) personal injury and death so caused by a condition or use of
    tangible personal or real property if the governmental unit
    would, were it a private person, be liable to the claimant
    according to Texas law.
    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 101.021.
    What are the liability limits for governmental units under the Act?
    Liability of a municipality under the Act is limited to money damages in a
    maximum amount of $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each single
    occurrence for bodily injury or death and $100,000 for each single occurrence
    for injury to or destruction of property.
    What type of actions are not covered by the Act?
    The Act does not limit the liability of a city for damages that result from the
    city’s performance of proprietary functions. Even prior to the passage of the Act,
    a city could be held liable for the negligent performance of proprietary
    functions. Proprietary functions are those functions that a municipality may, in
    its discretion, perform in the interest of the inhabitants of the municipality.
    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 101.0215 (b).
    Section 101.0215 of the Act specifically lists three activities that are considered
    proprietary and 36 activities that are considered governmental functions. The
    proprietary functions listed in the statute include the operation and maintenance
    of a public utility; the operation of amusements that are owned and operated by
    the municipality; and any activity that is abnormally dangerous or “ultrahazardous”.
    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 101.0215 (b). It is important to note
    that the list of 36 governmental functions is exclusive, while the list of
    proprietary functions is not. This means that, for the purposes of the Act, only
    these 36 specifically enumerated activities are considered governmental
    functions. Conversely, even though the statute lists three activities as
    “proprietary functions”, the reality is that, for the purposes of the Act, any
    activity that the city engages in that is not listed as a governmental function is
    considered proprietary in nature. If a proprietary function is involved and
    liability is established, there is no limit to the amount of damages that may be
    I’m still not clear on the difference between “governmental” functions and
    “proprietary” functions.
    Governmental functions are those functions that are imposed on a city by law
    and are given to the city by the state, as part of the state’s sovereignty, to be
    exercised by the city in the interest of the general public. Governmental
    functions involve providing for the health, safety, and welfare of the general
    public. Examples of governmental functions include police and fire protection,
    health and sanitation services, parks and zoos, zoning and animal control. Tex.
    Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, §101.0215(a).
    Proprietary functions are those functions that a city may perform in its
    discretion, and the functions are performed to serve the interests of the
    inhabitants of the city. Examples of proprietary functions include operation and
    maintenance of a public utility or amusements owned and operated by a city.
    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, §101.0215(b). Under state law, the distinction
    between governmental and proprietary functions is significant because the city’s
    liability for governmental functions exists only to the extent that it has been
    waived under the Act. However, for proprietary functions, the city is liable to
    the same extent as a private entity or individual.
    Does the Act provide immunity for individual public officials?
    No. The Act does not provide immunity for individual public officials. The Act
    addresses immunity only for the governmental entity itself. There are other legal
    doctrines that come into play with regard to official immunity. Texas courts
    have adopted a doctrine of limited official immunity. In certain cases, it absolves
    a public officer or employee from personal liability for acts within the scope of
    the officer’s or employee’s governmental authority.
    Texas case law provides either absolute immunity or qualified immunity to a
    public servant depending on the type of authority retained by that individual. For
    example, judges are generally entitled to the defense of absolute or complete
    immunity in the exercise of judicial functions. Turner v. Pruitt, 342 S.W.2d 422
    (Tex. 1961).
    The majority of Texas public servants, however, may only assert a defense of
    qualified immunity from liability. Qualified immunity provides protection from
    liability for discretionary actions taken in good faith within the scope of the
    officer’s or employee’s authority. Determination of whether an action was taken
    in good faith is a fact issue and a discretionary action involves the exercise of
    discretion or judgment.
    There is no qualified immunity for ministerial (i.e. mandatory) actions for which
    the public servant has no choice. Worsham v. Votgsberger, 129 S.W. 157
    (Civ.App. 1919, no writ). For example, the duties of jailers and sheriffs in
    receiving and caring for prisoners are usually held to be ministerial, as are those
    of animal pound directors. The line between a discretionary duty and a
    ministerial one is difficult to draw and competent legal advice should be sought
    when liability is at issue.
    To what extent are cities liable for the actions of volunteers?
    The Texas Tort Claims Act waives sovereign immunity for certain actions of
    governmental employees. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 101.021 (1)
    (Vernon 2001). The Act defines an employee as “a person, including an officer
    or agent, who is in the paid service of a governmental unit.” Id. § 101.001(1). In
    Harris County v. Dillard, the Texas Supreme Court concluded that an unpaid
    “volunteer” is not an “employee” for whose acts the governmental unit can be
    held liable. 883 S.W.2d 166, 167 (Tex. 1994).
    Are cities liable for injuries sustained by volunteers?
    To the extent authorized by the Act, cities may be liable to persons, including
    volunteers, for property damage, personal injury, and death proximately caused
    by the wrongful act, omission or negligence of a city employee, or the condition
    or use of personal or real property. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §101.021
    (Vernon 2001). Consequently, cities may want to limit their liability for
    negligence by obtaining workers’ compensation coverage for their volunteers.
    Cities can opt to cover volunteer fire fighters, police officers, emergency
    medical personnel, and “other volunteers” who are named under the cities’
    workers compensations coverage. Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §504.012 (Vernon
    2001). With limited exceptions, the recovery of workers’ compensation benefits
    is the exclusive remedy for the death or work-related injuries of covered
    individuals. Id. § 408.001.
    Also, many liability policies have a standard exclusion provision denying
    coverage for claims arising from injuries to volunteers if the city has purchased
    workers’ compensation coverage for employees but not for volunteers. Thus,
    cities should consider obtaining workers’ compensation coverage for volunteers.
    For more details, please contact the TML Intergovernmental Risk Pool.


    Thank you for taking the time to read the article and I also included a hot-link to the actual statue at the beginning of the blog.  Information is powerful and certainly helps us all with decision making.

    If you have further questions, please reach out to me personally or your elected official.

    Have a great day in Alpine,

    Erik Zimmer, City Manager

  • Water Billing Update

    Dear Citizens,

    I’ve had a few additional comments trickle into my office regarding the water bills, billing cycle, etc…  With respect to those items, I thought it would be helpful to lay out how the City of Alpine Water/Wastewater/Sanitation billing transpires on a monthly basis.

    We do have a meter reader (Charles M.) who reads the meters throughout our community every month.  Each day, his results are shared with our billing clerk (Melissa C.) who verifies and works to ensure accuracy on the inputs.  She also handles the re-read requests and any sort of billing questions.  Three days prior to the end of the month, our billing clerk runs a series of reports for final verification – and makes any updates that are required.  At that point, our billing clerk initiates an e-print of the customers bills.

    Our software partner (Asyst) will then take the e-print file and convert that to our postcard format that is hard-printed and handed off to the USPS in Dallas.  From there, the USPS transports to their El Paso region center, and then distributed to the recipients.

    I hope this explanation gives further detail to our process and procedure.  We did convert from the Dearing Billing software to Asyst for our Water/Sewer/Sanitation billing in January of 2016.  The reason for the conversion was multi-faceted.  First and foremost, the old Dearing software had no maintenance support and put our data at risk of being lost due to a system/hardware malfunction.  We also wanted to move forward with implementing the software that our Gas Department utilized (which has been Asyst) in order to help with our overall employee readiness and cross-training.

    The majority of last months bills were lost by the USPS in the transition between Dallas and El Paso.  We apologize that happened, but it is not uncommon.  As I’ve shared with staff, I typically have 3-4 bills from various vendors not make it to my mailbox on an annual basis.   It’s also been a nice opportunity for me to remind my recently turned adult son that there will be times he does not get a bill from a creditor or vendor, and he still needs to take the initiative to pay them timely.

    Moving forward, we will have the next set of bills going out by the end of the month (as described in the process above).  My hope is that the USPS does not happen to find the lost ones from last month and deliver both at the same time.  If they do, I’m sure we will all handle it.

    We also are working on our e-Bill and e-Payment initiatives to further enhance citizens abilities to view and handle their water, sewer, sanitation and gas bills.  As we roll out, we anticipate many of the requestor’s of this type of functionality will be happy.

    As always, feel free to call Melissa or Cora with any questions on your Water billing.  They are eager and willing to help.  My only request is that we keep the conversations professional and data driven.  If you have questions they can not answer, Megan, J or myself will be glad to get involved in the dialogue.

    Thank you and have a great rest of the week in Alpine,

    Erik Zimmer, City Manager

Menu Title